9/3/2023 0 Comments Django liveview![]() You can configure as many variables as you need or add them as root in config.yamlįirst file to be executed in your application. In the future it should grow with other private, management, identification or APIs. When a route is visited, a function within the appropriate view is called.Įxample of a public view. Source code in Clojure, the heart of the beast. NameĮxample of a template that will contain all the structure that will not change between pages, such as the header or footer. Add as many libraries as you need.Įxample of README.md file for your project.Įverything related to the template system or static files (javascript, images, styles.). You can see more information in ConfigurationĬlojure configuration. By default you will find domain, debug and port. The configuration of your application, to which you can add all the variables you need. Let's see the description of the relevant sections. Django is deliberately very slow and steady, so I doubt it will ever be brought into the core framework.When you generate your project you will find the following structure. As long as there is an ecosystem of well-maintained libraries for solving this problem then I think thats good enough. I dont think it needs to be out-of-the-box. If you don't use websockets and just send regular GET/POST/PUT/PATCH requests then I think it will work really well in Django. Its pretty impressive and I reccommend learning more about the OTP/BEAM to understand how thats possible ( wiki-link). Phoenix LiveView will literally store the entire client-side state on the server (that can be whatever you want) and the application barely breaks a sweat. (This is why companies like Discord and WhatsApp use this runtime). In Elixir, distributed, long-running systems (which is what this really is) can reach a very large scale even on single application instances. In python to use channels you have to bring something like redis to persist state and I've heard third-hand that scaling Django-channels can be challenging. Elixir is particularly well-suited to the websocket approach in ways that other programming languages and runtimes are not.Yes I definitely think it will become more popular - its getting traction in multiple web framework ecosystems (Python, Ruby and Elixir that I know of).However, one thing I do wish was handled a little bit better in Django would be static assets like django-compressor, but it should stay generic IMO. Having third-party packages to enable devs to use whatever they want seems like the right move because integrating a particular client-side library into Django seems like it could be a challenge to keep up to date and working well. If it was a few years ago, the push would have been to integrate Backbone or Angular with Django. I think Django has been wise in the past not to get too entangled with client-side technologies.None use HTMX or Alpine.js as far as I know. Most do use Django Channels, but Unicorn doesn't (disclaimer: I'm the creator of Unicorn). I've detailed the Django libraries that are close to LiveView/Hotwire/Livewire here. But, neither has any interaction with Django Channels as far as I've seen. Alpine.js is more generic and provides a mechanism to add client-side tasks right in the markup. HTMX feels oriented around replacing manual AJAX calls with rendering snippets of HTML from whatever backend you use.Learning Vue/React will probably benefit a normal dev's resume much more than learning LiveView (as much as it pains me to say that). My guess is that this approach will slowly gain popularity, but will never rival Vue/React for a few reasons: Vue and React have a lot of developer mindshare right now and there are ecosystems around each framework so devs can add in additional functionality quickly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |